ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Size-matching in lung transplantation by computed tomography for end-stage interstitial disease: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The addition of computed tomography (CT) findings maintains the predictive performance of an existing radiograph-based donor lung acceptability score.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Compatibility analysis of total lung capacity values measured by segmentation with computed tomography and helium dilution method.Annals of thoracic medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Size matching between donors and recipients is a major issue in lung transplantation (LTx), especially in patients with restrictive lung disease (RLD). This study aims to evaluate computed tomography (CT) as an additional method for defining the total lung capacity (TLC) in patients with end-stage interstitial disease awaiting LTx. Methods: Clinical data and CT scans from patients who underwent a first LTx from January 2014 to July 2018 in Bichat Hospital, Paris, were prospectively included in a database. CT TLC (ctTLC) was retrospectively calculated after semi-automatic contouring of the parenchyma and compared with measured TLC (mTLC) and predicted TLC (pTLC) values. Results: The study group included 89 patients (male:female =68:21; mean age, 59.5±10.0 years). The time between pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and CT scan was 162±270 days [median, 67 days; interquartile range (IQR), 0-233 days]. ctTLC was inferior to mTLC and pTLC (respectively 2,979±1,001 mL, 3,530±1,077 and 6,381±955 mL, P<0.001). The relative difference between CT lung volume (ctLV) and measured lung volume (mLV) was higher on the left than on the right side (25.4% Conclusions: CT volume is a feasible method to assess TLC in patients with end-stage interstitial disease awaiting LTx. This study highlights potential size-mismatch for graft selection before LTx and opens the perspective of a prospective trial evaluating impact of size-matching by donor-recipient (D-R) ctTLC ratio on postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.