ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
More isn't always better: antibiotic duration after surgical decortication in pleural empyema.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What is new in pleural infections?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While ample high-level evidence supports the limited use of antibiotics post-source control in intraabdominal infections, there is a paucity of available data in guiding antibiotic duration for intrathoracic infections. This study aims to analyze patient outcomes among those who have undergone surgical decortication for parapneumonic pleural empyema, comparing cases managed with infectious disease (ID) specialists against those without, and to identify predictive factors influencing antibiotic duration post-source control. We hypothesized that antibiotic duration would vary depending on the involvement of ID specialists. Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed on patients with parapneumonic pleural empyemas who underwent surgical decortication at a single tertiary center from January 2011 to March 2021. Differences in patient characteristics and outcomes for those whose antibiotics were managed by ID or not were compared with Wilcoxon two-sample tests and Fisher's exact tests. Linear regression was used to evaluate for significant factors predictive of antibiotic duration. Results: A total of 116 patients underwent surgical decortication for pleural empyema of parapneumonic etiology. ID specialists were involved with antibiotic management in 62 (53.4%) cases, while the remaining cases were not managed by ID. Demographics and patient comorbidities were similar between both groups. Growth of preoperative fluid cultures was higher in patients managed by ID (40.3% Conclusions: Antibiotic duration for pleural empyema managed with surgical decortication is significantly dependent on ID involvement, preoperative growth of cultures, and preoperative ventilator status. However, outcomes, including disease recurrence and 30-day mortality, were similar between patients regardless of ID involvement and longer length of antibiotics, raising the question of what the adequate duration of antibiotics is for patients who receive appropriate source control for pleural empyema. Further study with randomized control trials should be conducted to provide high-level evidence regarding length of antibiotics in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.