Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983071›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2023

Prevalence of subclinical keratoconus and impact on adults undergoing routine, uncomplicated age-related cataract extraction.

Tu M Tran, Aman Mittal, Vihar Naik, Priyanka Chhadva, Matthew Wade, Sumit Garg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Comprehensive evaluation of oculus pentacam in subclinical keratoconus and clinical keratoconus patients at different stages.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tu M TranDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Aman MittalDean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, OK, United States.
Vihar NaikSchool of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Priyanka ChhadvaGavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Matthew WadeGavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Sumit GargGavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To determine the prevalence of subclinical keratoconus (SKCN) among individuals undergoing routine, uncomplicated age-related cataract surgery and its impact on visual and refractive outcomes. Patient and Methods: At a major academic ophthalmology department in the United States, we reviewed records of patients aged 50 years and older who underwent surgery from January 2011 to June 2022. We excluded patients who had poor-quality or unreliable tomographic data, previous corneal surgery, keratorefractive procedures, and significant vision-limiting ocular pathology. We defined SKCN if an eye had a Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia index (BAD-D) ≥1.7, which was based on the results of a meta-analysis of large studies. In addition to the BAD-D cutoff, the eye had to deviate significantly on at least one of seven additional parameters: 1) posterior elevation at thinnest point, 2) index of vertical asymmetry, 3) index of surface variation, 4) total front higher order aberrations, 5) front vertical coma, 6) front secondary vertical coma, 7) back vertical coma. An individual had SKCN if at least one eye met the tomography-based classification and did not have manifest KCN in either eye. Visual and refractive outcomes data were acquired from patients of one experienced cataract surgeon with cases done from July 2021 to June 2022. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Among 5592 eyes from 3828 individuals, the prevalence of SKCN was 24.7% (95% CI, 23.4 - 26.1, 945 individuals), and the prevalence of KCN was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.6 - 2.4, 87 individuals). The prevalence of SKCN did not increase with age and was more prevalent among females and non-white races. Median post-operative month one distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA) and proportion of eyes with improvement in DCVA were similar between normal and SKCN eyes. The proportion of eyes reaching ±0.5 and ±1.0 diopter within the refractive target were similar between normal and SKCN eyes. Conclusion: SKCN is highly prevalent and should be detected but is unlikely to have a significant deleterious effect on outcomes in routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery.

Indexed as

cataractkeratoconusprevalencesubclinical keratoconustomographytopography

Identifiers

PMID38983071
PMCPMC11182208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.