ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2023
Efficacy and safety of 'dropless vitrectomy surgery' and comparison of outcomes to standard of care topical therapy.
Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visual Outcomes and Safety Profile of "Dropless Vitrectomy" for Epiretinal Membranes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective/Background: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide/moxifloxacin (Tri-Moxi) with the standard eye drop regimen for controlling postoperative inflammation, intraocular pressure, infections, macular thickness, and visual acuity (VA) in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for various retinal disorders. Subject/Methods: In this retrospective longitudinal study, patients who underwent vitrectomy using intravitreal Tri-Moxi at the end of surgery (Group 1) were compared with those who received standard topical steroid antibiotics (Group 2) in terms of intraocular inflammation, intraocular pressure, macular thickness based on optical coherence tomography, and visual acuity. Results: In total, 162 consecutive eyes (group 1 [81 eyes]; group 2 [82 eyes]) were included. VA improved by two lines in both groups at 90 days. In Group 1, preoperative VA (logMAR) was 0.92 (0.66) compared to 0.92 (0.75) in Group 2 (p = 1), while at 3 months, it was 0.61 (0.3) and 0.57 (0.3), respectively (p = 0.46). Group 1 showed superior outcomes concerning central foveal thickness. The average central foveal thickness CFT (µm) in group 2 preoperatively was 423 (95) and 348 (63) at 3 months compared to group 1 526 (109) and 306 (108) preoperatively and 3 months, respectively (p = 0.042). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of elevated intraocular pressure between the two groups or anterior chamber cell reaction severity, and no cases of endophthalmitis were observed in either group. Conclusions: Tri-Moxi is effective after vitrectomy and is not inferior to standard postoperative topical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.