ReviewFrontiers in ophthalmology2023
Geographic atrophy: pathophysiology and current therapeutic strategies.
Review in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the Geographic Atrophy Journey: Patient and Physician Perspectives to Inform Better Care.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Hydrogel-encapsulated antioxidant nanotherapeutics against age-related macular degeneration (AMD) oxidative damage.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Complement Inhibition in Geographic Atrophy: Clinical Evidence for Pegcetacoplan and Avacincaptad Pegol.Cureus · 2026Review
- A Novel N-TerminalClinical case reports · 2026Article
- CircAFF3 modulation of p53-ID2 signaling in the retinal pigment epithelium links inflammation with cell death in dry age-related macular degeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- ProbioticAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diverse-Ancestry GWAS of Age-Related Macular Degeneration on 16,108 Examined Cases and 18,038 Controls.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Diet, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Vascular Endothelial Damage, and the Microbiome: Drivers of Ocular Degenerative and Inflammatory Diseases.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Review
- Features that distinguish age-related macular degeneration from aging.Experimental eye research · 2025Review
- Gene Therapies in Clinical Development to Treat Retinal Disorders.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024Review
- Circulating Anti-Endothelial Cell Antibodies in Patients with Geographic Atrophy Related to Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Epigenetic Switches in Retinal Homeostasis and Target for Drug Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Bridging the gap of vision restoration.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced stage of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that leads to gradual and permanent vision loss. GA is characterized by the loss of photoreceptor cells and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), leading to distinct atrophic patches in the macula, which tends to increase with time. Patients with geographic atrophy often experience a gradual and painless loss of central vision, resulting in difficulty reading, recognizing faces, or performing activities that require detailed vision. The primary risk factor for the development of geographic atrophy is advanced age; however, other risk factors, such as family history, smoking, and certain genetic variations, are also associated with AMD. Diagnosis is usually based on a comprehensive eye examination, including imaging tests such as fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography. Numerous clinical trials are underway, targeting identified molecular pathways associated with GA that are promising. Recent approvals of Syfovre and Izervay by the FDA for the treatment of GA provide hope to affected patients. Administration of these drugs resulted in slowing the rate of progression of the disease. Though these products provide treatment benefits to the patients, they do not offer a cure for geographic atrophy and are limited in efficacy. Considering these safety concerns and limited treatment benefits, there is still a significant need for therapeutics with improved efficacy, safety profiles, and better patient compliance. This comprehensive review discusses pathophysiology, currently approved products, their limitations, and potential future treatment strategies for GA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.