Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983016›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2023

Orbital fractures and concurrent ocular injury in a New Zealand tertiary centre.

Nicholas J Theis, Pritesh Narsinh, Samuel Newlands, Jason Erasmus, Rebecca Stack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas J TheisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Pritesh NarsinhDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Samuel NewlandsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Jason ErasmusDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Rebecca StackDepartment of Ophthalmology, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Orbital fractures are a common presentation to acute care and carry an associated risk of ocular injury, however, previous research has not investigated injury rates by fracture category. These patients are frequently assessed by non-ophthalmic clinicians, however, limited data exists regarding referral patterns and how this impacts recorded injury rates (1-3). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all orbital fractures presenting to a tertiary hospital in Christchurch, New Zealand between March 2019 and March 2021. Data including mechanism of injury, fracture type, demographic characteristics, and associated ocular injury were recorded. Results: 284 patients with orbital fractures were identified. 41% of patients had isolated wall fractures, while 59% had complex orbitofacial fractures. Fractures were more common in males, and occurred more frequently in young individuals. The most common mechanism of injury was interpersonal violence (32%), followed by falls (23%). 41% of patients were reviewed by ophthalmology ( Conclusion: Orbital fractures have a high rate of concurrent ocular injury in our study population, though rates of subsequent intraocular surgery are low. There was no significant difference in injury rates between isolated and complex fracture categories. Vision-threatening ocular injury occurred in 4.9% of fractures.

Indexed as

facial traumaocular injuryophthalmologyorbitorbital fractures

Identifiers

PMID38983016
PMCPMC11182195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.