ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Intelligent Recommendation Systems Powered by Consensus Neural Networks: The Ultimate Solution for Finding Suitable Chiral Chromatographic Systems?
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward AI-Assisted Greener Chiral HPLC: Predicting Efficient Enantioseparation-Mobile Phase (EES-MP) Profiles for MP Selection─A Lux Cellulose-1 Case Study.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Quantum Chemistry Based Simulation of Enantioseparation on Cyclodextrin- and Polysaccharide-Based Chiral Stationary Phases.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The selection of suitable combinations of chiral stationary phases (CSPs) and mobile phases (MPs) for the enantioresolution of chiral compounds is a complex issue that often requires considerable experimental effort and can lead to significant waste. Linking the structure of a chiral compound to a CSP/MP system suitable for its enantioseparation can be an effective solution to this problem. In this study, we evaluate algorithmic tools for this purpose. Our proposed consensus model, which uses multiple optimized artificial neural networks (ANNs), shows potential as an intelligent recommendation system (IRS) for ranking chromatographic systems suitable for the enantioresolution of chiral compounds with different molecular structures. To evaluate the IRS potential in a proof-of-concept stage, 56 structural descriptors for 56 structurally unrelated chiral compounds across 14 different families are considered. Chromatographic systems under study comprise 7 cellulose and amylose derivative CSPs and acetonitrile or methanol aqueous MPs (14 chromatographic systems in all). The ANNs are optimized using a fit-for-purpose version of the chaotic neural network algorithm with competitive learning (CCLNNA), a novel approach not previously applied in the chemical domain. CCLNNA is adapted to define the inner ANN complexity and perform feature selection of the structural descriptors. A customized target function evaluates the correctness of recommending the appropriate CSP/MP system. The ANN-consensus model exhibits no advisory failures and requires only an experimental attempt to verify the IRS recommendation for complete enantioresolution. This outstanding performance highlights its potential to effectively resolve this problem.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.