Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982923›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2024

Volatilome: A Novel Tool for Risk Scoring in Ischemic Heart Disease.

Basheer Abdullah Marzoog

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06181799 (Biomarkers of the Exhaled Breath and Single-Lead Electrocardiography in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Ischemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06181799 completednot on this map

Biomarkers of the Exhaled Breath and Single-Lead Electrocardiography in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Ischemia

TypeobservationalSponsorI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease, Chronic Coronary Disease, Angina PectorisArmsMass spectrometry using the PTR TOF-1000 (IONICON PTR-TOF-MS - Trace VOC Analyzer, Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 3, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria (Europe).
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Basheer Abdullah MarzoogWorld-Class Research Center «Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare», I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5507-2413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing a novel risk score for accurate assessment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality is an urgent need in terms of early prevention and diagnosis and, thereafter, management, particularly of ischemic heart disease. The currently used scores for the evaluation of cardiovascular disease based on the classical risk factors suffer from severe limitations, including inaccurate predictive values. Therefore, we suggest adding a novel non-classical risk factor, including the level of specific exhaled volatile organic compounds that are associated with ischemic heart disease, to the SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP algorithms. Adding these nonclassical risk factors can be used together with the classical risk factors (gender, smoking, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, ethnicity, etc.) to develop a new algorithm and further program to be used widely.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMyocardial IschemiaBreath TestsHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compoundscardiovascular diseaseischemic heart diseasemyocardial infarction.SCORE2SCORE2-OPSMART risk scoreVolatilome

Identifiers

PMID38982923
PMCPMC11440330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.