ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025
Mitral Annulus Disjunction: A Comprehensive Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Phenotype and Clinical Outcomes Study.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mitral Annular Disjunction Assessed Using Cardiac MR Imaging in Pediatric Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical importance of mitral annulus disjunction (MAD) is not well established. PURPOSE: Characterize a population of MAD all-comers diagnosed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: MAD confirmed in 222 patients, age of 49.2 ± 19.3 years, 126 (56.8%) males. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T and 3 T/steady-state free precession and inversion recovery. ASSESSMENT: Clinical history, outcomes, imaging, and arrhythmia data. MAD defined as a separation ≥2 mm between left ventricular myocardium and mitral annulus. Presence and pattern of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were analyzed. LGE in the papillary muscles and adjacent to MAD were identified as MAD related. Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) were grouped into non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias (NSVA) or sustained. Cardiovascular death assessed. STATISTICAL TESTS: Differences between baseline characteristics were compared. Univariate regression was used to investigate possible associations between ventricular arrhythmia and cardiovascular death with characteristics associated with the severity of MAD. A multivariable logistic regression included significant variables from the univariate analysis and was performed for MAD-related and global LGE.
resultsMAD extent 5.0 ± 2.6 mm. MV annulus expanded during systole for MAD ≥6 mm. Systolic expansion associated with prolapse, billowing, and curling. LGE present in 82 patients (36.9%). Twenty-three patients (10.4%) showed MAD-related LGE by three different observers. No association of LGE with MAD extent (P = 0.545) noted. Follow-up 4.1 ± 2.4 years. No sustained VA observed. In univariable analysis, NSVA was more prevalent in patients with MAD ≥6 mm (33.3% vs. 9.9%), but this was attenuated on multivariate analysis (P = 0.054). The presence of NSVA was associated with global LGE but not MAD-related LGE in isolation (P = 0.750). Three patients died of cardiovascular causes (1.4%) and none had MAD-related LGE. None died of sudden cardiac arrest.
conclusionIn patients referred for cardiac MRI, mitral valve dysfunction was associated with MAD severity. Scar was not related to the extent of MAD, but associated with NSVA. The risk of sustained arrhythmias and cardiovascular death was low in this population. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.