Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982659›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2024

Surveillance of respiratory viruses by aerosol screening in indoor air as an early warning system for epidemics.

Zeynep Bengi Eren, Cansel Vatansever, Berk Kabadayı, Bedirhan Haykar, Zeynep Ece Kuloğlu, Sedat Ay, Kamila Nurlybayeva, Gül Eyikudamacı, Tayfun Barlas, Erhan Palaoğlu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Shotgun metagenomics on indoor air for surveillance of respiratory, enteric, and skin viruses in a Belgian daycare setting, January to December 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zeynep Bengi ErenKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0003-8141-5071
Cansel VatanseverKoç University İşBank Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3703-1882
Berk KabadayıKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bedirhan HaykarKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zeynep Ece KuloğluKoç University İşBank Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), Istanbul, Turkey.
Sedat AyKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kamila NurlybayevaKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gül EyikudamacıKoç University İşBank Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), Istanbul, Turkey.
Tayfun BarlasKoç University İşBank Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), Istanbul, Turkey.
Erhan PalaoğluDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yeşim BeşliDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mert Ahmet KuşkucuKoç University İşBank Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), Istanbul, Turkey.
Önder ErgönülKoç University İşBank Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), Istanbul, Turkey.
Fusun CanKoç University İşBank Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9387-2526

Funding

Koç University-İşBank Center for Infectious DiseasesThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 1919B012218221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of effective methods for the surveillance of seasonal respiratory viruses is required for the timely management of outbreaks. We aimed to survey Influenza-A, Influenza-B, RSV-A, Rhinovirus and SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in a tertiary hospital and a campus over 5 months. The effectiveness of air screening as an early warning system for respiratory viruses was evaluated in correlation with respiratory tract panel test results. The overall viral positivity was higher on the campus than in the hospital (55.0% vs. 38.0%). Influenza A was the most prevalent pathogen in both locations. There were two influenza peaks (42nd and 49th weeks) in the hospital air, and a delayed peak was detected on campus in the 1st-week of January. Panel tests indicated a high rate of Influenza A in late December. RSV-A-positivity was higher on the campus than the hospital (21.6% vs. 7.4%). Moreover, we detected two RSV-A peaks in the campus air (48th and 51st weeks) but only one peak in the hospital and panel tests (week 49). Although rhinovirus was the most common pathogen in panel tests, rhinovirus positivity was low in air samples. The air screening for Influenza-B and SARS-Cov-2 revealed comparable positivity rates with panel tests. Air screening can be integrated into surveillance programs to support infection control programs for potential epidemics of respiratory virus infections except for rhinoviruses.

Indexed as

COVID-19RhinovirusSARS-CoV-2AerosolsAir MicrobiologyAir Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental MonitoringEpidemicsHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanRespiratory Tract InfectionsSeasonsVirusesAerosols

Identifiers

PMID38982659
PMCPMC11233404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.