Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982580›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024

Morphometrics and Phylogenomics of Coca (Erythroxylum spp.) Illuminate Its Reticulate Evolution, With Implications for Taxonomy.

Natalia A S Przelomska, Rudy A Diaz, Fabio Andrés Ávila, Gustavo A Ballen, Rocío Cortés-B, Logan Kistler, Daniel H Chitwood, Martha Charitonidou, Susanne S Renner, Oscar A Pérez-Escobar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natalia A S PrzelomskaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-4565
Rudy A DiazRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9080-9468
Fabio Andrés ÁvilaThe New York Botanical Garden, New York, NY 10458, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8225-2548
Gustavo A BallenInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-8608
Rocío Cortés-BHerbario Forestal Universidad Distrital, Campus El Vivero, CR 5E 15-82 Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2781-5747
Logan KistlerDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5730-5986
Daniel H ChitwoodDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4875-1447
Martha CharitonidouDepartment of Biological Applications and Technology, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9657-8362
Susanne S RennerDepartment of Biology, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3704-0703
Oscar A Pérez-EscobarRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9166-2410
Alexandre AntonelliRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1842-9297

Funding

BBSRC BB/T01282X/1FAPESP (#2023/07838-1Kew FoundationSwedish Research Council 2019-05191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

South American coca (Erythroxylum coca and E. novogranatense) has been a keystone crop for many Andean and Amazonian communities for at least 8,000 years. However, over the last half-century, global demand for its alkaloid cocaine has driven intensive agriculture of this plant and placed it in the center of armed conflict and deforestation. To monitor the changing landscape of coca plantations, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime collects annual data on their areas of cultivation. However, attempts to delineate areas in which different varieties are grown have failed due to limitations around identification. In the absence of flowers, identification relies on leaf morphology, yet the extent to which this is reflected in taxonomy is uncertain. Here, we analyze the consistency of the current naming system of coca and its four closest wild relatives (the "coca clade"), using morphometrics, phylogenomics, molecular clocks, and population genomics. We include name-bearing type specimens of coca's closest wild relatives E. gracilipes and E. cataractarum. Morphometrics of 342 digitized herbarium specimens show that leaf shape and size fail to reliably discriminate between species and varieties. However, the statistical analyses illuminate that rounder and more obovate leaves of certain varieties could be associated with the subtle domestication syndrome of coca. Our phylogenomic data indicate extensive gene flow involving E. gracilipes which, combined with morphometrics, supports E. gracilipes being retained as a single species. Establishing a robust evolutionary-taxonomic framework for the coca clade will facilitate the development of cost-effective genotyping methods to support reliable identification.

Indexed as

PhylogenyBiological EvolutionCocaPlant LeavescocaErythroxylumleaf cropsmorphometricsphylogenomicstaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID38982580
PMCPMC11233275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.