Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982399›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2024

Implement social prescribing successfully towards embedding: what works, for whom and in which context? A rapid realist review.

C Bos, E de Weger, I Wildeman, N Pannebakker, P F Kemper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Embedding Music in Care at Mayo Clinic.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Digital social prescribing: a concept analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C BosNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Public Health, Care and Society, Department of health and Care Nationally, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands. Cheryl.bos@rivm.nl.
E de WegerVrije universiteit Amsterdam, Athena Instituut, de Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
I WildemanTNO child health, Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands.
N PannebakkerTNO child health, Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands.
P F KemperNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Public Health, Care and Society, Department of health and Care Nationally, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome clients who access healthcare services experience problems due to the wider determinants of health which cannot be addressed (solely) by the medical sector. Social Prescribing (SP) addresses clients ' wider health needs and is based on linkworkers who support primary care clients in accessing social, community and voluntary care services that support their needs. Previous literature has provided valuable insights about what works (or not) in an early stage of implementing SP. However, there is limited insight into what works for the implementation of SP towards embedding. This study provides guiding principles by which SP can be successfully implemented towards the embedding stage and identifies which contextual factors and mechanisms influence these guiding principles.

methodsA Rapid Realist Review was conducted to examine what works, for whom, why, and in which contexts. A local Dutch reference panel consisting of health and care organisations helped to inform the research questions. Additionally, a workshop was held with the panel, to discuss what the international insights mean for their local contexts. This input helped to further refine the literature review's findings.

resultsFive guiding principles were identified for successful implementation of SP at the embedding stage: • Create awareness for addressing the wider determinants of health and the role SP services can play; • Ensure health and care professionals build trusting relationships with all involved stakeholders to create a cyclical referral process; • Invest in linkworkers' skills and capacity so that they can act as a bridge between the sectors; • Ensure clients receive appropriate support to improve their self-reliance and increase their community participation; • Invest in the aligning of structures, processes and resources between involved sectors to support the use of SP services.

conclusionTo embed SP, structural changes on a system level as well as cultural changes are needed. This will require a shift in attitude amongst health and care professionals as well as clients towards the use, role and benefit of SP services in addressing the wider determinants of health. It will also require policymakers and researchers to involve communities and include their perspectives.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNetherlandsSocial Determinants of HealthAddressing wider health needsEmbeddingImplementationIntegrated care, person-centred careRapid realist reviewSocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID38982399
PMCPMC11234751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.