Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982386›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Prevalence and mechanisms of aminoglycoside resistance among drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates in Iran.

Nilofar Saeli, Saghar Jafari-Ramedani, Rashid Ramazanzadeh, Maryam Nazari, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Farzad Khademi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Isolation and characterization of a lytic phage and its efficacy against multi-drug resistant strains of pseudomonas aeruginosa.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Characterisation of a NovelPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Resistome in the indoor dust samples from workplaces and households: a pilot study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nilofar SaeliDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Saghar Jafari-RamedaniDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Rashid RamazanzadehDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Maryam NazariDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Amirhossein SahebkarCenter for Global Health Research, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Farzad KhademiDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran. k_farzad@yahoo.com.

Funding

Ardabil University of Medical Sciences 402000378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAminoglycosides have been a cornerstone of the treatment of nosocomial infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa for over 80 years. However, escalating emergence of resistance poses a significant challenge. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevailing patterns of aminoglycoside resistance among clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa in Iran; as well as the underlying resistance mechanisms observed in patients referred to Ardabil hospitals.

methodsA total of 200 isolates from five hospitals were evaluated. The resistance profiles of P. aeruginosa isolates to tobramycin, amikacin, and netilmicin were determined using the disk diffusion method. The capacity of aminoglycoside-resistant isolates to form biofilms was assessed through a phenotypic assay, and the results were confirmed using the gene amplification technique. The presence of genes associated with aminoglycoside resistance was detected using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to measure the expression levels of genes encoding the MexXY-OprM efflux pump and PhoPQ two-component system (TCS).

resultsThe prevalence of aminoglycoside-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates was 48%, with 94.7% demonstrating multidrug resistance (MDR). All aminoglycoside-resistant P. aeruginosa strains exhibited biofilm-forming capabilities and harbored all the genes associated with biofilm production. Among the nine genes encoding 16S rRNA methylase and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, three genes were detected in these isolates: aac(6')-Ib (85.4%), ant(2'')-Ia (18.7%), and aph(3')-VI (3.1%). Additionally, all aminoglycoside-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates carried mexY and phoP genes, although the expression levels of mexY and phoP were 75% and 87.5%, respectively.

conclusionGiven the considerably high prevalence of aminoglycoside-resistant P. aeruginosa strains, urgent measures are warranted to transition towards the use of novel aminoglycosides and to uphold vigilant surveillance of resistance patterns.

Indexed as

AminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsAmikacinBacterial ProteinsCross InfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansIranPrevalenceTobramycinAmikacinAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsTobramycinAminoglycosidePseudomonas aeruginosaResistance

Identifiers

PMID38982386
PMCPMC11232330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.