Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982325›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Assessing LLIN distribution implementation using evidence-informed intervention core elements: a qualitative study in a resource-constrained setting.

Phyllis Dako-Gyeke, Emmanuel Asampong, Franklin N Glozah, Ruby Hornuvo, Philip Teg-Nefaah Tabong, David Gittelman, Adanna Nwameme, Benjamin Oteng, Nana Yaw Peprah, Gloria M Chandi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Phyllis Dako-GyekeDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Emmanuel AsampongDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. easampong@ug.edu.gh.
Franklin N GlozahDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Ruby HornuvoDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Philip Teg-Nefaah TabongDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
David GittelmanAdvisor, Health Campaign Effectiveness Coalition, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA.
Adanna NwamemeDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Benjamin OtengNational Malaria Elimination Programme, Accra, Ghana.
Nana Yaw PeprahNational Malaria Elimination Programme, Accra, Ghana.
Gloria M ChandiGhana Health Service, Ga North Municipal Health Directorate, Greater Accra, Ghana.
Philip B AdongoDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Malaria Elimination Programme implements the mass LLIN Distribution Campaigns in Ghana. Implementation science promotes the systematic study of social contexts, individual experiences, real-world environments, partnerships, and stakeholder consultations regarding the implementation of evidence-informed interventions. In this paper, we assess the core elements of the mass LLIN distribution campaign in a resource constrained setting to learn best implementation practices. Three core domains were assessed through the application of Galbraith's taxonomy (i.e., implementation, content, and pedagogy) for evidence-informed intervention implementation.

methodsSix districts in two regions (Eastern and Volta) in Ghana participated in this study. Fourteen Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted across these communities. Eligible participants were purposively sampled considering age, occupation, gender, and care giving for children under 5 years and household head roles. All audio-recorded FGDs were transcribed verbatim, data was assessed and coded through deductive and inductive processes. NVivo software version 13 was used for the coding process. Themes were refined, legitimized, and the most compelling extracts selected to produce the results.

resultsSixty-nine (69) caregivers of children under 5 years and sixty (60) household heads participated in the FGDs. All caregivers were females (69), whilst household heads included more males (41). Core elements identified under implementation domain of the LLIN distribution campaign in Ghana include the registration and distribution processes, preceded by engagement with traditional authorities and continuous involvement of community health volunteers during implementation. For pedagogy domain, core elements include delivery of intervention through outreaches, illustrations, demonstrations, and the use of multiple communication channels. Core elements realized within the content domain include information on effective malaria prevention, and provision of information to enhance their self-efficacy. Yet, participants noted gaps (e.g., misuse) in the desired behavioural outcome of LLIN use and a heavy campaign focus on women. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Although the implementation of the mass LLIN distribution campaigns exhibit components of core elements of evidence informed interventions (implementation, content and pedagogy), it has not achieved its desired behavioural change intentions (i.e. continuous LLIN use). Future campaigns may consider use of continuous innovative pedagogical approaches at the community level and lessons learnt from this study to strengthen the implementation process of evidence-based health interventions. There is also the need for standardization of core elements to identify the number of core elements required within each domain to achieve efficacy. ETHICAL APPROVAL: Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (GHS-ERC: 002/06/21) before the commencement of all data collection.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsMalariaQualitative ResearchAdultCaregiversChild, PreschoolFemaleGhanaHumansImplementation ScienceInfantMaleMiddle AgedCampaignCore elementsEvidence informed interventionsGhanaImplementationLong lasting insecticide treated nets (LLIN)MalariaTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID38982325
PMCPMC11234562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.