Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982309›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Predicting blood-brain barrier permeability of molecules with a large language model and machine learning.

Eddie T C Huang, Jai-Sing Yang, Ken Y K Liao, Warren C W Tseng, C K Lee, Michelle Gill, Colin Compas, Simon See, Fuu-Jen Tsai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Peptide-functionalized nanoparticles for brain-targeted therapeutics.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eddie T C HuangNVIDIA AI Technology Center, NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, USA.
Jai-Sing YangDepartment of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ken Y K LiaoNVIDIA AI Technology Center, NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, USA.
Warren C W TsengNVIDIA AI Technology Center, NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, USA.
C K LeeNVIDIA AI Technology Center, NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, USA.
Michelle GillNVIDIA AI Technology Center, NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, USA.
Colin CompasNVIDIA AI Technology Center, NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, USA.
Simon SeeNVIDIA AI Technology Center, NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, USA.
Fuu-Jen TsaiSchool of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, China Medical University Children's Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, Taichung, 404332, Taiwan. 000704@tool.caaumed.org.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability of small-molecule compounds using a novel artificial intelligence platform is necessary for drug discovery. Machine learning and a large language model on artificial intelligence (AI) tools improve the accuracy and shorten the time for new drug development. The primary goal of this research is to develop artificial intelligence (AI) computing models and novel deep learning architectures capable of predicting whether molecules can permeate the human blood-brain barrier (BBB). The in silico (computational) and in vitro (experimental) results were validated by the Natural Products Research Laboratories (NPRL) at China Medical University Hospital (CMUH). The transformer-based MegaMolBART was used as the simplified molecular input line entry system (SMILES) encoder with an XGBoost classifier as an in silico method to check if a molecule could cross through the BBB. We used Morgan or Circular fingerprints to apply the Morgan algorithm to a set of atomic invariants as a baseline encoder also with an XGBoost classifier to compare the results. BBB permeability was assessed in vitro using three-dimensional (3D) human BBB spheroids (human brain microvascular endothelial cells, brain vascular pericytes, and astrocytes). Using multiple BBB databases, the results of the final in silico transformer and XGBoost model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 on the held-out test dataset. Temozolomide (TMZ) and 21 randomly selected BBB permeable compounds (Pred scores = 1, indicating BBB-permeable) from the NPRL penetrated human BBB spheroid cells. No evidence suggests that ferulic acid or five BBB-impermeable compounds (Pred scores < 1.29423E-05, which designate compounds that pass through the human BBB) can pass through the spheroid cells of the BBB. Our validation of in vitro experiments indicated that the in silico prediction of small-molecule permeation in the BBB model is accurate. Transformer-based models like MegaMolBART, leveraging the SMILES representations of molecules, show great promise for applications in new drug discovery. These models have the potential to accelerate the development of novel targeted treatments for disorders of the central nervous system.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierMachine LearningPermeabilityComputer SimulationDrug DiscoveryEndothelial CellsHumansArtificial intelligence (AI)Blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeabilityMachine learningNatural Products Research Laboratories (NPRL)

Identifiers

PMID38982309
PMCPMC11233737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.