ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Optimizing open-angle glaucoma risk assessment in patients with retinal vein occlusions.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: 'Optimizing open-angle glaucoma risk assessment in patients with retinal vein occlusions'.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Response to 'Comment on: 'Optimizing open-angle glaucoma risk assessment in patients with retinal vein occlusions".Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Remote Monitoring of Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusions Treated with Anti-VEGF: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The relationship between the intraocular position of dexamethasone intravitreal implant and post-injection intraocular pressure elevation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate factors associated with the diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) after a retinal vein occlusion (RVO).
designRetrospective, cross-sectional study.
methodsPatients diagnosed with OAG after RVO were matched 2:1 with RVO patients without prior glaucoma. Logistic regression identified factors linked to OAG diagnosis.
resultsOf 1178 RVO patients without initial OAG, 51 (4.5%) were later diagnosed with OAG after an average of 5.5 ± 6.1 years. Screening tests for OAG were performed at a higher frequency in patients diagnosed with OAG compared with patients who never received this diagnosis (visual field [VF] testing 21.6% versus 10.8% (P = 0.073) and retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] imaging 52.9% versus 27.4% (P = 0.002), respectively). At the time of the first VF obtained after RVO, mean deviation averaged -10.3 dB in the affected eyes, compared with -5.0 dB in the fellow eyes (P < 0.001); in contrast, RNFL thickness was similar between eyes at the time of OAG diagnosis (72 µm versus 74 µm, P = 0.290). Predictive factors for OAG diagnosis included higher intraocular pressure (IOP) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) in the unaffected eye, and the absence of macular edema in the RVO-affected eye (R
conclusionsOAG is a significant risk factor for RVO. Our study reveals a reciprocal relationship between RVO and the development of OAG, highlighting the need for glaucoma risk assessment in all patients with RVOs to avoid delays in diagnosis and vision loss from glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.