Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Combination of error-prone PCR (epPCR) and Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning (CPEC) for improving the coverage of random mutagenesis libraries.

Natalia Ossa-Hernández, Luis Fernando Marins, Daniela Volcan Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in the Directed Evolution of Computer-aided Enzymes.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalia Ossa-HernándezDepartamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle (UV), Cali, Colombia. nattio.biologia@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7785-7585
Luis Fernando MarinsLaboratório de Biologia Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7219-5295
Daniela Volcan AlmeidaInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPEL, Campus Universitário Capão do Leão s/n, Pelotas, RS, 96160-000, Brazil. danivolcan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-220X

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 454689/2014-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random mutagenesis, such as error-prone PCR (epPCR), is a technique capable of generating a wide variety of a single gene. However, epPCR can produce a large number of mutated gene variants, posing a challenge in ligating these mutated PCR products into plasmid vectors. Typically, the primers for mutagenic PCRs incorporate artificial restriction enzyme sites compatible with chosen plasmids. Products are cleaved and ligated to linearized plasmids, then recircularized by DNA ligase. However, this cut-and-paste method known as ligation-dependent process cloning (LDCP), has limited efficiency, as the loss of potential mutants is inevitable leading to a significant reduction in the library's breadth. An alternative to LDCP is the circular polymerase extension cloning (CPEC) method. This technique involves a reaction where a high-fidelity DNA polymerase extends the overlapping regions between the insert and vector, forming a circular molecule. In this study, our objective was to compare the traditional cut-and-paste enzymatic method with CPEC in producing a variant library from the gene encoding the red fluorescent protein (DsRed2) obtained by epPCR. Our findings suggest that CPEC can accelerate the cloning process in gene library generation, enabling the acquisition of a greater number of gene variants compared to methods reliant on restriction enzymes.

Indexed as

Cloning, MolecularGene LibraryMutagenesisPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseGenetic VectorsPlasmidsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA recombinationGene amplificationMolecular cloningRandom mutationsVariant genes

Identifiers

PMID38982265
PMCPMC11233677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.