ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2024
Escherichia coli DNA replication: the old model organism still holds many surprises.
Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic diversity of clamp loading at small DNA gaps.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Review
- Visualizing the interplay of Cas1-Cas2 with DNA replication-repair that creates CRISPR-Cas immunity.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- The E. coli DnaX clamp loader sharply bends DNA to load β-clamp at nicks and small gaps.Molecular cell · 2026Article
- Archaeal family B DNA polymerase facilitates lagging strand DNA replication in the Thermococcales.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of chromosomal DNA replication in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- The A, B, C, D's of replicative DNA polymerase fidelity: utilizing high-throughput single-molecule sequencing to understand the molecular basis for DNA polymerase accuracy.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Functional asymmetry in processivity clamp proteins.Biophysical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on Escherichia coli DNA replication paved the groundwork for many breakthrough discoveries with important implications for our understanding of human molecular biology, due to the high level of conservation of key molecular processes involved. To this day, it attracts a lot of attention, partially by virtue of being an important model organism, but also because the understanding of factors influencing replication fidelity might be important for studies on the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Importantly, the wide access to high-resolution single-molecule and live-cell imaging, whole genome sequencing, and cryo-electron microscopy techniques, which were greatly popularized in the last decade, allows us to revisit certain assumptions about the replisomes and offers very detailed insight into how they work. For many parts of the replisome, step-by-step mechanisms have been reconstituted, and some new players identified. This review summarizes the latest developments in the area, focusing on (a) the structure of the replisome and mechanisms of action of its components, (b) organization of replisome transactions and repair, (c) replisome dynamics, and (d) factors influencing the base and sugar fidelity of DNA synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.