Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982156›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The association of the persecutory ideation questionnaire with clinically-relevant and other outcomes: the moderating role of confidence.

Darío Díaz, Pablo Briñol, Miriam Bajo, Maria Stavraki, Luis Beato-Fernández, Richard E Petty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Darío DíazDepartment of Psychology, Ciudad Real Medical School, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, Camino de Moledores S/N, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain. dario.diaz@uclm.es.
Pablo BriñolUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Miriam BajoDepartment of Psychology, Ciudad Real Medical School, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, Camino de Moledores S/N, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Maria StavrakiDepartment of Psychology, Ciudad Real Medical School, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, Camino de Moledores S/N, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Luis Beato-FernándezHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Richard E PettyOhio State University, Columbus, USA.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2020-116651GB-C32
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most used self-administered instruments to assess persecutory delusions is the Persecutory Ideation Questionnaire (PIQ). Individual differences in PIQ scores are important because they predict the severity of symptoms associated with psychosis-related disorders. The current research demonstrates that PIQ is associated with two new outcomes: Satisfaction with life (Studies 1 and 2) and therapy length needed for hospital discharge (Study 2). Most relevant, we introduce meta-cognitive confidence in one's scale responses as a construct capable of improving the predictive validity of the PIQ. Across two studies, participants from the general population (Study 1) and from a clinical sample (Study 2) completed the PIQ and then reported the confidence in their responses. As expected, the PIQ was associated with satisfaction with life in both cases and duration of therapy required to receive hospital discharge for the clinical sample. Most importantly, confidence further moderated the extent to which the PIQ scores were linked with both outcomes, with greater consistency between the PIQ and the dependent measures obtained for those with higher confidence. Therefore, asking a single item about the confidence associated with responses to the PIQ enhances the association of PIQ scores and relevant consequences across domains.

Indexed as

DelusionsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionPsychotic DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38982156
PMCPMC11233644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.