Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982124›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Recovery effect of self-myofascial release treatment using different type of a foam rollers.

Bartłomiej Michalak, Anna Kopiczko, Robert Gajda, Jakub Grzegorz Adamczyk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06974409 (The Effects of Foam Rolling on Double-leg Squat Force Distribution), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06974409 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Foam Rolling on Double-leg Squat Force Distribution

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RedlandsRan2025 to 2025Enrolled21ConditionsForce Production, Pain Intensity AssessmentArmsfoam roller
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bartłomiej MichalakDepartment of Theory of Sport, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Marymoncka 34 St., 00-968, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna KopiczkoDepartment of Human Biology, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Marymoncka 34 St., 00-968, Warsaw, Poland.
Robert GajdaCenter for Sports Cardiology, Gajda-Med Medical Center in Pułtusk, 06-100, Pułtusk, Poland.
Jakub Grzegorz AdamczykDepartment of Theory of Sport, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Marymoncka 34 St., 00-968, Warsaw, Poland. jakub.adamczyk@awf.edu.pl.

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science. AWF Research Project (UPB No. 4)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among athletes, foam rolling is popular technique of myofascial release aimed to support recovery processes and counteract delayed onset muscle soreness. However, there is no consensus on the optimal parameters of the roller texture used in the procedure. The study aimed to determine whether using rollers with different textures and hardness (smooth/soft, grooved/mid, serrated/hard) in myofascial release affects post-exertional restitution rate and the level of perceived DOMS (Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness) after intense anaerobic exercise. The study involved 60 healthy and physically active men randomly divided into three experimental groups and one control group (passive rest)-each consisting of 15 individuals: STH-rolling with a smooth roller; G-rolling with a grooved roller; TP-rolling with a serrated roller; Pass-passive rest group. After performing a exercise test (one-minute high-intensity squat), blood lactate (LA), creatine kinase (CK) and pain perception (VAS Scale) were monitored. The analysis of the average LA concentration in the blood 30 min post-exercise showed a statistical difference for all rolling groups compared to the passive rest group: STH (p < 0.001), G (p < 0.001), TP (p = 0.035). No statistically significant differences were found between the CK measurement results in individual assessments. Statistically significant differences in VAS values were observed between G (p = 0.013) and TP (p = 0.006) groups and the Pass group at 48 h, as well as between STH (p = 0.003); G (p = 0.001); TP (p < 0.001) groups and the Pass group at 72 h. Based on statistical data, a strong influence (η

Indexed as

MyalgiaAdultCreatine KinaseExerciseHumansLactic AcidMaleYoung AdultCreatine KinaseLactic AcidCreatine kinaseLactate clearanceMyofascial releaseRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID38982124
PMCPMC11233653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.