Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982068›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

A joint diffusion/collision model for crystal growth in pure liquid metals.

Hua Men

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hua MenBCAST, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK. hua.men@brunel.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3625-6043

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/N007638/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/P020194/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/S036296/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/T022213/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kinetics of atomic attachments at the liquid/solid interface is one of the foundations of solidification theory, and to date one of the long-standing questions remains: whether or not the growth is thermal activated in pure liquid metals. Using molecular dynamics simulations and machine learning, I have demonstrated that a considerable fraction of liquid atoms at the interfaces of Al(111), (110) and (100) needs thermal activation for growth to take place while the others attach to the crystal without an energy barrier. My joint diffusion/collision model is proved to be robust in predicting the general growth behaviour of pure metals. Here, I show this model is able to quantitatively describe the temperature dependence of growth kinetics and to properly interpret some important experimental observations, and it significantly advances our understanding of solidification theory and also is useful for modelling solidification, phase change materials and lithium dendrite growth in lithium-ion battery.

Identifiers

PMID38982068
PMCPMC11233554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.