Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982048›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Linking the composition of cryoconite prokaryotic communities in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Central Caucasus with their chemical characteristics.

Grigory V Gladkov, Anastasiia K Kimeklis, Rustam Kh Tembotov, Mikhail N Ivanov, Evgeny E Andronov, Evgeny V Abakumov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grigory V Gladkov *Department of Applied Ecology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034.
Anastasiia K Kimeklis *Department of Applied Ecology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034.
Rustam Kh TembotovDepartment of Applied Ecology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034.
Mikhail N IvanovDepartment of Cryolithology and Glaciology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, Russia, 119991.
Evgeny E AndronovLaboratory of Microbiological Monitoring and Bioremediation of Soils, All-Russian Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Pushkin, Russia, 196608.
Evgeny V AbakumovDepartment of Applied Ecology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034. e.abakumov@spbu.ru.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2022-322 date 22 April 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryoconites are the deposits on the surface of glaciers that create specific ecological niches for the development of microorganism communities. The sediment material can vary in origin, structure, and nutrient content, creating local variations in the growth conditions. An additional factor of variability is the location of the glaciers, as they are found in different climatic zones in the high mountain regions and closer to the poles. Here, using the analysis of amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, we studied the taxonomic composition of the prokaryotic communities from glaciers from remote regions, including the Arctic (Mushketova on the Severnaya Zemlya, IGAN in Polar Ural), Antarctic (Pimpirev on the Livingstone Island) and Central Caucasus (Skhelda and Garabashi) and connected it with the variation of the physicochemical characteristics of the substrate: pH, carbon, nitrogen, macro- and microelements. The cryoconite microbiomes were comprised of specific for this environment phyla (mostly Pseudomonadota, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidota, Acidobacteriota, and Actinobacteriota), but each glacier had a unique taxonomic imprint. The core microbiome between regions was composed of only a few ASVs, among which the most likely globally distributed ones attributed to Polaromonas sp., Rhodoferax sp., Cryobacterium sp., and Hymenobacter frigidus. The WGSNA defined clusters of co-occurring ASVs between microbiomes, that significantly change their abundance corresponding with the variation of chemical parameters of cryoconites, but do not fully coincide with their regional separation. Thus, our work demonstrates that the chemical characteristics of the sediment material can explain the variation in the cryoconite prokaryotic community which is not always linked to geographic isolation.

Indexed as

Ice CoverMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntarctic RegionsArctic RegionsBacteriaGeologic SedimentsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAAmplicon sequencingChemical parametersCryoconiteGeographic locationProkaryotic community

Identifiers

PMID38982048
PMCPMC11233692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.