Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38981906›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2025

Body MRI in pediatrics: where we are and what the future holds.

Sudha A Anupindi, Jonathan R Dillman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sudha A AnupindiDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. anupindi@chop.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7784-3108
Jonathan R DillmanDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-0164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for disease diagnosis, characterization, and monitoring in children of all ages. MRI has numerous advantages when compared to other imaging modalities, including a lack of ionizing radiation, superior soft tissue image contrast, and ability to provide objective, quantitative assessments. As MRI continues to evolve, pediatric body MRI examinations of the future will certainly be different than our current and past protocols. In this review article, we will discuss the present and likely future states of pediatric body MRI, including the increasing application of quantitative MRI methods, faster imaging techniques and implementation of abbreviated targeted protocols, and the growing use of artificial intelligence methods.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPediatricsArtificial IntelligenceChildForecastingHumansBodyChildrenFutureMagnetic resonance imagingPediatrics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.