ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Exploring Progression and Differences in Facial Asymmetry for Hemifacial Microsomia and Isolated Microtia: Insights from Extensive 3D Analysis.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Innovative tissue engineering strategies for auricular regeneration in microtia: Current advances and future perspectives.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAiming to measure and compare asymmetry of facial hard and soft tissues in patients with HFM and isolated microtia, examining how it evolves.
methodsThis cross-sectional study assessed facial asymmetry in male East Asian patients aged 5-12 diagnosed with unilateral hemifacial microsomia (Pruzansky-Kaban types I and IIA) or isolated microtia. Using 3D imaging of computed tomography scans, it measured root-mean-square (RMS) values for surface deviations across facial regions. Statistical analyses explored differences between conditions and the relationship of age with facial asymmetry.
resultsA total of 120 patients were categorized into four groups by condition (HFM or isolated microtia) and age (5-7 and 8-12 years). Patients with HFM exhibited the greatest asymmetry in the lower cheek, while those with isolated microtia showed primarily upper face asymmetry. Significant differences, except in the forehead and nasal soft tissue, were noted between the groups across age categories. Notable distinctions in hard tissue were found between age groups in the nasal and mid-cheek areas for patients with HFM (median RMS (mm) 0.9 vs. 1.1, P = 0.02; 1.5 vs. 1.7, P = 0.03) and in the nasal and upper lip areas for patients with isolated microtia (median RMS (mm) 0.8 vs. 0.9, P = 0.002; 0.8 vs. 1.0, P = 0.002). Besides these areas for HFM, no significant age-asymmetry correlation was detected.
conclusionsSignificant differences in facial asymmetry were observed between HFM and isolated microtia, with the asymmetry in specific area evolving over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
38981899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.