Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38981869›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024

AI for detection, classification and prediction of loss of alignment of distal radius fractures; a systematic review.

Koen D Oude Nijhuis, Lente H M Dankelman, Jort P Wiersma, Britt Barvelink, Frank F A IJpma, Michael H J Verhofstad, Job N Doornberg, Joost W Colaris, Mathieu M E Wijffels, Machine Learning Consortium

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Koen D Oude Nijhuis *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Groningen, Groningen University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands. k.d.oude.nijhuis@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-3837
Lente H M Dankelman *Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands. l.dankelman@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8106-680X
Jort P WiersmaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Groningen, Groningen University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Britt BarvelinkDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank F A IJpmaDepartment of Surgery, Groningen, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michael H J VerhofstadTrauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Job N DoornbergDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Groningen, Groningen University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joost W ColarisDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mathieu M E WijffelsTrauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Machine Learning Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly and accurate assessment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) is crucial for optimal prognosis. Identifying fractures likely to lose threshold alignment (instability) in a cast is vital for treatment decisions, yet prediction tools' accuracy and reliability remain challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), can evaluate radiographic images with high performance. This systematic review aims to summarize studies utilizing CNNs to detect, classify, or predict loss of threshold alignment of DRFs.

methodsA literature search was performed according to the PRISMA. Studies were eligible when the use of AI for the detection, classification, or prediction of loss of threshold alignment was analyzed. Quality assessment was done with a modified version of the methodologic index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).

resultsOf the 576 identified studies, 15 were included. On fracture detection, studies reported sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80 to 99% and 73-100%, respectively; the AUC ranged from 0.87 to 0.99; the accuracy varied from 82 to 99%. The accuracy of fracture classification ranged from 60 to 81% and the AUC from 0.59 to 0.84. No studies focused on predicting loss of thresholds alignement of DRFs.

conclusionAI models for DRF detection show promising performance, indicating the potential of algorithms to assist clinicians in the assessment of radiographs. In addition, AI models showed similar performance compared to clinicians. No algorithms for predicting the loss of threshold alignment were identified in our literature search despite the clinical relevance of such algorithms.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadius FracturesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsWrist FracturesArtificial intelligencessDistal radius fracturesTraumaWrist

Identifiers

PMID38981869
PMCPMC11666746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.