Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38981634›Full record

ArticleNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2024

Leveraging multivariate analysis and adjusted mutual information to improve stroke prediction and interpretability.

Moutasem S Aboonq, Saeed A Alqahtani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moutasem S AboonqFrom the Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9137-0941
Saeed A AlqahtaniFrom the Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a machine learning model to accurately predict stroke risk based on demographic and clinical data. It also sought to identify the most significant stroke risk factors and determine the optimal machine learning algorithm for stroke prediction.

methodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed data on 438,693 adults from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Features encompassed demographics and clinical factors. Descriptive analysis profiled the dataset. Logistic regression quantified risk relationships. Adjusted mutual information evaluated feature importance. Multiple machine learning models were built and evaluated on metrics like accuracy, AUC ROC, and F1 score.

resultsKey factors significantly associated with higher stroke odds included older age, diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, and history of myocardial infarction or angina. Random forest model achieved the best performance with accuracy of 72.46%, AUC ROC of 0.72, and F1 score of 0.74. Cross-validation confirmed its reliability. Top features were hypertension, myocardial infarction history, angina, age, diabetes status, and cholesterol.

conclusionThe random forest model robustly predicted stroke risk using demographic and clinical variables. Feature importance highlighted priorities like hypertension and diabetes for clinical monitoring and intervention. This could help enable data-driven stroke prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningStrokeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38981634
PMCPMC11305345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.