ReviewJournal of proteome research2025
Are We There Yet? Assessing the Readiness of Single-Cell Proteomics to Answer Biological Hypotheses.
Review in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- MLMarker: a machine learning framework for tissue inference and biomarker discovery.Genome biology · 2026Article
- In Depth Characterization of the Promoter Proximal Proteome of Single Copy Locus FOXP2.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- What Are the Practical Applications of Single-Cell Proteomics?Proteomes · 2026Article
- Classification with Missing Data - AbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Single-cell proteomics using mass spectrometry.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- Evaluating Biocompatibility: From Classical Techniques to State-of-the-Art Functional Proteomics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Digital spatial profiling identifies the tumor center as a topological niche in prostate cancer characterized by an upregulation of BAD.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell analysis is an active area of research in many fields of biology. Measurements at single-cell resolution allow researchers to study diverse populations without losing biologically meaningful information to sample averages. Many technologies have been used to study single cells, including mass spectrometry-based single-cell proteomics (SCP). SCP has seen a lot of growth over the past couple of years through improvements in data acquisition and analysis, leading to greater proteomic depth. Because method development has been the main focus in SCP, biological applications have been sprinkled in only as proof-of-concept. However, SCP methods now provide significant coverage of the proteome and have been implemented in many laboratories. Thus, a primary question to address in our community is whether the current state of technology is ready for widespread adoption for biological inquiry. In this Perspective, we examine the potential for SCP in three thematic areas of biological investigation: cell annotation, developmental trajectories, and spatial mapping. We identify that the primary limitation of SCP is sample throughput. As proteome depth has been the primary target for method development to date, we advocate for a change in focus to facilitate measuring tens of thousands of single-cell proteomes to enable biological applications beyond proof-of-concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.