Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38981548›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2024

Evaluating Solid Phase Adsorption Toxin Tracking (SPATT) for passive monitoring of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS).

James N Dodds, Kaylie I Kirkwood-Donelson, Anna K Boatman, Detlef R U Knappe, Nathan S Hall, Astrid Schnetzer, Erin S Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James N DoddsDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, United States of America. Electronic address: jndodds@unc.edu.
Kaylie I Kirkwood-DonelsonDepartment of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States of America; Immunity, Inflammation, and Disease Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC 27709, United States of America.
Anna K BoatmanDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, United States of America.
Detlef R U KnappeDepartment of Civil, Construction, & Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States of America.
Nathan S HallDepartment of Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, NC 28557, United States of America.
Astrid SchnetzerDepartment of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States of America.
Erin S BakerDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, United States of America. Electronic address: erinmsb@unc.edu.

Funding

Single cell, multi-parametric high throughput platform to classify endocrine disruptor potential of mixturesP42ES027704 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Weihsueh A Chiu · 2017 to 2026
$21.2M
Uncovering the Mechanisms of PFAS-induced ImmunotoxicityP42ES031009 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOPPIN, JANE · 2020 to 2024
$9.3M
Mass Spectrometry-based Untargeted MetabolomicsZICES103363 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JARMUSCH, ALAN · 2021 to 2025
$6.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC ES103363NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027704NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES031009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection and monitoring of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in aquatic environments has become an increasingly higher priority of regulatory agencies as public concern for human intake of these chemicals continues to grow. While many methods utilize active sampling strategies ("grab samples") for precise PFAS quantitation, here we evaluate the efficacy of low-cost passive sampling devices (Solid Phase Adsorption Toxin Tracking, or SPATTs) for spatial and temporal PFAS assessment of aquatic systems. For this study, passive samplers were initially deployed in North Carolina along the Cape Fear River during the summer and fall of 2016 and 2017. These were originally intended for the detection of microcystins and monitoring potentially harmful algal blooms, though this period also coincided with occurrences of PFAS discharge from a local fluorochemical manufacturer into the river. Additional samplers were then deployed in 2022 to evaluate changes in PFAS fingerprint and abundances. Assessment of PFAS showed legacy compounds were observed across almost all sampling sites over all 3 years (PFHxS, PFOS, PFHxA, etc.), while emerging replacement PFAS (e.g., Nafion byproducts) were predominantly localized downstream from the manufacturer. Furthermore, samplers deployed downstream from the manufacturer in 2022 noted sharp decreases in observed signal for replacement PFAS in comparison to samplers deployed in 2016 and 2017, indicating mitigation and remediation efforts in the area were able to reduce localized fluorochemical contamination.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdsorptionIon Mobility SpectrometryMass SpectrometryNorth CarolinaRiversFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalCape Fear RiverPassive samplersPFASSkylineSPATT

Identifiers

PMID38981548
PMCPMC11295640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.