Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38981517›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2024

A chemo-mechanical constitutive model for muscle activation in bat wing skins.

Alyssa Skulborstad, N C Goulbourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alyssa SkulborstadAerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
N C GoulbourneAerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5298-8511

Funding

National Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birds, bats and insects have evolved unique wing structures to achieve a wide range of flight capabilities. Insects have relatively stiff and passive wings, birds have a complex and hierarchical feathered structure and bats have an articulated skeletal system integrated with a highly stretchable skin. The compliant skin of the wing distinguishes bats from all other flying animals and contributes to bats' remarkable, highly manoeuvrable flight performance and high energetic efficiency. The structural and functional complexity of the bat wing skin is one of the least understood although important elements of the bat flight anatomy. The wing skin has two unusual features: a discrete array of very soft elastin fibres and a discrete array of skeletal muscle fibres. The latter is intriguing because skeletal muscle is typically attached to bone, so the arrangement of intramembranous muscle in soft skin raises questions about its role in flight. In this paper, we develop a multi-scale chemo-mechanical constitutive model for bat wing skin. The chemo-mechanical model links cross-bridge cycling to a structure-based continuum model that describes the active viscoelastic behaviour of the soft anisotropic skin tissue. Continuum models at the tissue length-scale are valuable as they are easily implemented in commercial finite element codes to solve problems involving complex geometries, loading and boundary conditions. The constitutive model presented in this paper will be used in detailed finite element simulations to improve our understanding of the mechanics of bat flight in the context of wing kinematics and aerodynamic performance.

Indexed as

ChiropteraFlight, AnimalModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalWings, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaSkin Physiological Phenomenabat wing skinchemo-mechanicalconstitutive modellingskeletal muscleviscoelastic

Identifiers

PMID38981517
PMCPMC11286139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.