Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38981516›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2024

Inference on spatiotemporal dynamics for coupled biological populations.

Jifan Li, Edward L Ionides, Aaron A King, Mercedes Pascual, Ning Ning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jifan LiDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Edward L IonidesDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4190-0174
Aaron A KingDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6159-3207
Mercedes PascualSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA.
Ning NingDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Funding

National Science FoundationNIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models in ecology and epidemiology must be consistent with observed data in order to generate reliable knowledge and evidence-based policy. Metapopulation systems, which consist of a network of connected sub-populations, pose technical challenges in statistical inference owing to nonlinear, stochastic interactions. Numerical difficulties encountered in conducting inference can obstruct the core scientific questions concerning the link between the mathematical models and the data. Recently, an algorithm has been proposed that enables computationally tractable likelihood-based inference for high-dimensional partially observed stochastic dynamic models of metapopulation systems. We use this algorithm to build a statistically principled data analysis workflow for metapopulation systems. Via a case study of COVID-19, we show how this workflow addresses the limitations of previous approaches. The COVID-19 pandemic provides a situation where mathematical models and their policy implications are widely visible, and we revisit an influential metapopulation model used to inform basic epidemiological understanding early in the pandemic. Our methods support self-critical data analysis, enabling us to identify and address model weaknesses, leading to a new model with substantially improved statistical fit and parameter identifiability. Our results suggest that the lockdown initiated on 23 January 2020 in China was more effective than previously thought.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AlgorithmsHumansModels, BiologicalPandemicsPopulation Dynamicsblock particle filterecologyepidemiologyMarkov processmetapopulation model

Identifiers

PMID38981516
PMCPMC11285444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.