ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2024
Case Report: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Case Series with Intralesional Treatment in Northeast Brazil.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2022, the Pan American Health Organization recommended the intralesional application (IL) of pentavalent antimonials in adult patients with localized cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. Other guidelines differ from that recommendation, considering that infections caused by a Leishmania species that can be associated with increased risk for mucosal leishmaniasis, in particular L. (V.) braziliensis, should not be eligible for intralesional treatment. This was a prospective interventional study carried out with eight patients diagnosed with CL residing in northeast Brazil during the period from 2019 to 2022. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study on the subject conducted in the northeast region, which has the second-highest number of cases in the country. In our sample, clinical cure was achieved with the use of intralesional treatment in all cases, and there were no serious adverse events or mucosal involvement during the 1-year follow-up period. We emphasize the importance of using the right criteria for choosing this therapeutic modality and highlight the advantages of intralesional treatment due to the lower risk of adverse events and cost reduction to health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.