ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2024
Diagnostic Utility of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients of Clinically Suspected Pure Neuritic Leprosy by Identifying Mycobacterium leprae in Skin Biopsy Samples and Nasal Swabs.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative analysis of the leprosy detection rate regarding its clinical spectrum through PCR using theFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Laboratory and functional tests in leprosy diagnosis: a practical guide for clinical decision-making.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pure neuritic leprosy (PNL) often remains underdiagnosed due to the lack of simple, reliable diagnostic tools to detect Mycobacterium leprae. This study aimed to investigate the utility of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPCR) in easily accessible and less invasive biopsy sites, including skin biopsy samples and nasal swabs (NSs), to detect M. leprae. A total of 30 (N = 30) clinically suspected and untreated patients with PNL were recruited. Nasal swabs and skin biopsy samples from the innervation territory of an "enlarged nerve" were collected. DNA was extracted and subjected to MPCR (targeting leprae-specific repetitive element [RLEP], 16S rRNA, and SodA genes) and RLEP-PCR (individual gene PCR). The PCR products were analyzed by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis. In 30 patients with clinically suspected PNL, 60% (N = 18) of skin biopsy samples and 53% (N = 16) of NSs were found positive for M. leprae DNA by MPCR, whereas only 23.3% (N = 7) of skin biopsy samples and 10% (N = 3) of NSs were found positive by RLEP-PCR. MPCR demonstrated a greater positivity rate than did RLEP-PCR for detection of M. leprae. Serologic positivity for anti-natural disaccharide-octyl conjugated with bovine serum albumin (ND-O-BSA) antibodies was 80% (16/20), including 35% (7/20) of PNL patients for which the skin MPCR was negative. Both serologic positivity and skin MPCR positivity were observed in 65% of patients (N = 20). Multiplex polymerase chain reaction is a useful tool for detection for M. leprae in skin biopsy samples and NSs in clinically suspected cases of PNL, with the added advantages of being less invasive and technically easier than nerve biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.