Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38981309›Full record

Observational studyESMO open2024

Pan-cancer analysis of heterogeneity of tumor mutational burden and genomic mutation under treatment pressure.

R J Huang, Y S Huang, N An, J J Hu, C Y Wu, Y X Chen, J Y Chen, Q Zhao, R H Xu, S Q Yuan and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spotlight onGenes · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Elacestrant plus alpelisib in anTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R J HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
Y S HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
N AnDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou.
J J HuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
C Y WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
Y X ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
J Y ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
Q ZhaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou; Bioinformatic Platform, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
R H XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou; Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China. Electronic address: xurh@sysucc.org.cn.
S Q YuanDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou. Electronic address: yuanshq@sysucc.org.cn.
F WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou; Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China. Electronic address: wangfeng@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh tumor mutational burden (TMB) is one of the widely researched predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors and has been shown to be closely related with response to immunotherapy in multiple cancer types. However, for patients who have failed conventional therapy and are about to undergo immunotherapy, there is no consensus recommendation on the timing of tumor sampling for TMB analysis, and the effects of different therapies on TMB have not been clarified. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the heterogeneity of TMB and genomic mutation under the treatment pressure. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively collected the available genomic and therapeutic information from 8051 samples across 15 tumor types (>50 samples/tumor) found in 30 published studies and investigated the distribution and heterogeneity of TMB under treatment across diverse cohorts.

resultsThis integrated analysis has shown anticancer treatments increased TMB. Significant effects of treatment on TMB were more frequently observed in tumor types with lower treatment-naïve TMB, including breast, prostate, and pediatric cancers. For different cancer therapies, chemotherapy was prone to be correlated with an increased TMB in most cancer types. Meanwhile, the fraction of the TMB-high category of breast, prostate, and bladder cancers and glioma increased significantly after chemotherapy. Several actionable genes including ERS1 and NF1 in breast cancer, as well as some prognostic markers including TERT in bladder cancer and IDH1 in glioma, were significantly changed in post-chemotherapy tumors compared to treatment-naïve tumors.

conclusionOur study reveals the heterogeneity of TMB under treatment across diverse cancer types and provides evidences that chemotherapy was associated with increases in TMB as well as the fraction of TMB-high category, suggesting that resampling tumor tissues for calculating post-chemotherapy TMB could be a better option for predicting the response to immunotherapy, especially for tumors with initially low TMB.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMutationNeoplasmsFemaleGenomicsHumansImmunotherapyRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, Tumorgenomic heterogeneityimmunotherapypan-cancer analysistherapeutics effectstumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID38981309
PMCPMC11292426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.