Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38981183›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2024

Network spillover effects associated with the ChooseWell 365 workplace randomized controlled trial to promote healthy food choices.

Mark C Pachucki, Chen-Shuo Hong, A James O'Malley, Douglas E Levy, Anne N Thorndike

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark C PachuckiDepartment of Sociology & Computational Social Science Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA. Electronic address: mpachucki@umass.edu.
Chen-Shuo HongDepartment of Sociology & Computational Social Science Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
A James O'MalleyDepartment of Biomedical Data Science and the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03756, USA.
Douglas E LevyHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Anne N ThorndikeHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Funding

Promoting Employee Health Through The Worksite Food EnvironmentR01HL125486 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI THORNDIKE, ANNE N · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
Psychological, cognitive, and genetic factors in a behavioral intervention to prevent weight gainR01DK114735 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI THORNDIKE, ANNE N · 2017 to 2019
$1.7M
Mentorship in patient-oriented research on behavioral and social determinants of cardiometabolic healthK24HL163073 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Anne N Thorndike · 2023 to 2026
$504k
Worksite Social Connections and Food Choice: Identifying Opportunities for Obesity PreventionR21DK109548 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LEVY, DOUGLAS · 2016 to 2017
$485k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL163073NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125486NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114735NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK109548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food choices are closely linked to culture, social relationships, and health. Because many adults spend up to half their time at work, the workplace provides a venue for changing population health-related behaviors and norms. It is unknown whether the effects of a workplace intervention to improve health behaviors might spread beyond participating employees due to social influence. ChooseWell 365 was a randomized controlled trial testing a 12-month healthy eating intervention grounded in principles of behavioral economics. This intervention leveraged an existing cafeteria traffic-light labeling system (green = healthy; red = unhealthy) in a large hospital workplace and demonstrated significant improvements in healthy food choices by employees in the intervention vs. control group. The current study used data from over 29 million dyadic purchasing events during the trial to test whether social ties to a trial participant co-worker (n = 299 intervention, n = 302 control) influenced the workplace food choices of non-participants (n = 7900). There was robust evidence that non-participants who were socially tied to more intervention group participants made healthier workplace food purchases overall, and purchased a greater proportion of healthy (i.e., green) food and beverages, and fewer unhealthy (i.e., red) beverages and modest evidence that the benefit of being tied to intervention participants was greater than being tied to control participants. Although individual-level effect sizes were small, a range of consistent findings indicated that this light-touch intervention yielded spillover effects of healthy eating behaviors on non-participants. Results suggest that workplace healthy eating interventions could have population benefits extending beyond participants.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDiet, HealthyFood PreferencesHealth PromotionWorkplaceAdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedCultureFood choiceSocial networksWorkplace health

Identifiers

PMID38981183
PMCPMC11385430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.