ArticlePLoS pathogens2024
Epistatic interaction between ERAP2 and HLA modulates HIV-1 adaptation and disease outcome in an Australian population.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Keystone Epitope Theory: An Ecological Perspective on RNA Viruses, Tumor Immunoediting, and Vaccine Design.Pathogens & immunity · 2026Review
- HIV-1 adapts to HLA class II-associated selection pressure exerted by CD4Science advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A strong genetic predictor of outcome following untreated HIV-1 infection is the carriage of specific alleles of human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) that present viral epitopes to T cells. Residual variation in outcome measures may be attributed, in part, to viral adaptation to HLA-restricted T cell responses. Variants of the endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidases (ERAPs) influence the repertoire of T cell epitopes presented by HLA alleles as they trim pathogen-derived peptide precursors to optimal lengths for antigen presentation, along with other functions unrelated to antigen presentation. We investigated whether ERAP variants influence HLA-associated HIV-1 adaptation with demonstrable effects on overall HIV-1 disease outcome. Utilizing host and viral data of 249 West Australian individuals with HIV-1 subtype B infection, we identified a novel association between two linked ERAP2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs2248374 and rs2549782) with plasma HIV RNA concentration (viral load) (P adjusted = 0.0024 for both SNPs). Greater HLA-associated HIV-1 adaptation in the HIV-1 Gag gene correlated significantly with higher viral load, lower CD4+ T cell count and proportion; P = 0.0103, P = 0.0061, P = 0.0061, respectively). When considered together, there was a significant interaction between the two ERAP2 SNPs and HLA-associated HIV-1 adaptation on viral load (P = 0.0111). In a comprehensive multivariate model, addition of ERAP2 haplotypes and HLA associated adaptation as an interaction term to known HLA and CCR5 determinants and demographic factors, increased the explanatory variance of population viral load from 17.67% to 45.1% in this dataset. These effects were not replicated in publicly available datasets with comparably sized cohorts, suggesting that any true global epistasis may be dependent on specific HLA-ERAP allelic combinations. Our data raises the possibility that ERAP2 variants may shape peptide repertoires presented to HLA class I-restricted T cells to modulate the degree of viral adaptation within individuals, in turn contributing to disease variability at the population level. Analyses of other populations and experimental studies, ideally with locally derived ERAP genotyping and HLA-specific viral adaptations are needed to elucidate this further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.