ArticleCancer discovery2024
Rational Protein Engineering to Enhance MHC-Independent T-cell Receptors.
Article in Cancer discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancers modulate processing and presentation of p53 neoantigens to evade T cell detection.Immunity · 2026Article
- Cell-autonomous control of CAR signaling and receptor shedding via ADAM17-mediated proteolysis.Cell · 2026Article
- CAR Treg therapies for neurodegenerative diseases.iScience · 2026Review
- Concept CARs are picking up speed.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- The Bidirectional Interplay between T Cell-Based Immunotherapies and the Tumor Microenvironment.Cancer immunology research · 2025Review
- Design of sensitive monospecific and bispecific synthetic chimeric T cell receptors for cancer therapy.Nature cancer · 2025Article
- Exploring structure-function relationships in engineered receptor performance using computational structure prediction.GEN biotechnology · 2025Article
- Biophysical and Structural Features of αβT-Cell Receptor Mechanosensing: A Paradigmatic Shift in Understanding T-Cell Activation.Immunological reviews · 2025Review
- Exploring structure-function relationships in engineered receptor performance using computational structure prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies have pioneered synthetic cellular immunity but remain limited in their long-term efficacy. Emerging data suggest that dysregulated CAR-driven T-cell activation causes T-cell dysfunction and therapeutic failure. To re-engage the precision of the endogenous T-cell response, we designed MHC-independent T-cell receptors (miTCR) by linking antibody variable domains to T-cell receptor constant chains. Using predictive modeling, we observed that this standard "cut and paste" approach to synthetic protein design resulted in myriad biochemical conflicts at the hybrid variable-constant domain interface. Through iterative modeling and sequence modifications, we developed structure-enhanced miTCRs which significantly improved receptor-driven T-cell function across multiple tumor models. We found that 41BB costimulation specifically prolonged miTCR T-cell persistence and enabled improved leukemic control in vivo compared with classic CAR T cells. Collectively, we have identified core features of hybrid receptor structure responsible for regulating function. Significance: Improving the durability of engineered T-cell immunotherapies is critical to enhancing efficacy. We used a structure-informed design to evolve improved miTCR function across several models. This work underscores the central role of synthetic receptor structure in T-cell function and provides a framework for improved receptor engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.