ArticleAnnals of botany2025
Physiological and structural traits contribute to thermotolerance in wild Australian cotton species.
Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early-stage identification of heat-tolerant cotton genotypes under simulated episodic heat stress in controlled conditions.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- New crops on the block: effective strategies to broaden our food, fibre, and fuel repertoire in the face of increasingly volatile agricultural systems.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsFive species of cotton (Gossypium) were exposed to 38 °C days during early vegetative development. Commercial cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) was contrasted with four wild cotton species (Gossypium australe, G. bickii, G. robinsonii and G. sturtianum) that are endemic to central and northern Australia.
methodsPlants were grown at daytime maxima of 30 or 38 °C for 25 days, commencing at the four-leaf stage. Leaf areas and shoot biomass were used to calculate relative rates of growth and specific leaf areas. Leaf gas exchange measurements revealed assimilation and transpiration rates, in addition to electron transport rates and carboxylation efficiency in steady-state conditions. Finally, leaf morphological traits (mean leaf area and leaf shape) were quantified, along with leaf surface decorations, imaged using scanning electron microscopy. KEY
resultsShoot morphology was differentially affected by heat, with three of the four wild species growing faster at 38 than at 30 °C, whereas early growth in G. hirsutum was severely inhibited by heat. Areas of individual leaves and the number of leaves both contributed to these contrasting growth responses, with fewer, smaller leaves at 38 °C in G. hirsutum. CO2 assimilation and transpiration rates of G. hirsutum were also dramatically reduced by heat. Cultivated cotton failed to achieve evaporative cooling, contrasting with the transpiration-driven cooling in the wild species. Heat substantially reduced electron transport rates and carboxylation efficiency in G. hirsutum, with much smaller effects in the wild species. We speculate that leaf shape, as assessed by invaginations of leaf margins, and leaf size contributed to heat dispersal differentially among the five species. Likewise, reflectance of light radiation was also highly distinctive for each species.
conclusionsThese four wild Australian relatives of cotton have adapted to hot days that are inhibitory to commercial cotton, deploying a range of physiological and structural adaptations to achieve accelerated growth at 38 °C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.