Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38980745›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2024

Geographic Access to Fertility Counseling among Adolescent and Young Adult Women with Cancer in North Carolina.

Nidia Rodriguez-Ormaza, Chelsea Anderson, Christopher D Baggett, Paul L Delamater, Melissa A Troester, Stephanie B Wheeler, Alexis C Wardell, Allison M Deal, Andrew Smitherman, Jennifer Mersereau and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nidia Rodriguez-OrmazaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-0809-5548
Chelsea AndersonCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6535-481X
Christopher D BaggettDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9563-203X
Paul L DelamaterDepartment of Geography, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3627-9739
Melissa A TroesterDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9506-6624
Stephanie B WheelerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3399-9047
Alexis C WardellLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-1413-3464
Allison M DealLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-3938
Andrew SmithermanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-1059-3853
Jennifer MersereauShady Grove Fertility, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2393-0836
Valerie L BakerDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-7339
Hazel B NicholsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0972-1560

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes in Adolescent and Young Adult Female Cancer SurvivorsR01CA204258 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLS, HAZEL B · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center)NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204258NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFertility counseling is recommended for adolescent and young adult women facing gonadotoxic cancer therapy. However, fertility care is subspecialized medical care offered at a limited number of institutions, making geographic access a potential barrier to guideline-concordant care. We assessed the relationship between geographic access and receipt of fertility counseling among adolescent and young adult women with cancer.

methodsUsing data from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, we identified women diagnosed with lymphoma, gynecologic cancer, or breast cancer at ages 15 to 39 years during 2004 to 2015. Eligible women were invited to complete an online survey on various topics, including fertility counseling. Geographic access was measured, using geocoded addresses, as vehicular travel time from residence to the nearest fertility clinic available at diagnosis. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between travel time and receipt of fertility counseling by provider type: health care provider versus fertility specialist.

resultsAnalyses included 380 women. The median travel time to a fertility clinic was 31 (IQR: 17-71) minutes. Overall, 75% received fertility counseling from a health care provider and 16% by a fertility specialist. Women who lived ≥30 minutes from a clinic were 13% less likely to receive fertility counseling by a health care provider (prevalence ratio: 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.00) and 49% less likely to receive counseling by a fertility specialist (prevalence ratio: 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.93).

conclusionsWomen who lived further away from fertility clinics were less likely to receive fertility counseling. IMPACT: Interventions to improve access to fertility counseling should include strategies to alleviate the burden of geographic access.

Indexed as

CounselingHealth Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultFemaleFertility PreservationHumansNeoplasmsNorth CarolinaRegistriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38980745
PMCPMC11371502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.