Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38980712›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

A Simple and Systematic Approach to Qualitative Data Extraction From Social Media for Novice Health Care Researchers: Tutorial.

Kelly Pretorius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kelly PretoriusSchool of Health Sciences, St. Edward's University, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0130-743X

Funding

Advanced Training in Self-Management Interventions for Serious Chronic ConditionsT32NR018407 · NINR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KNOPF, AMELIA S, MILLER, WENDY RENEE · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR018407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media analyses have become increasingly popular among health care researchers. Social media continues to grow its user base and, when analyzed, offers unique insight into health problems. The process of obtaining data for social media analyses varies greatly and involves ethical considerations. Data extraction is often facilitated by software tools, some of which are open source, while others are costly and therefore not accessible to all researchers. The use of software for data extraction is accompanied by additional challenges related to the uniqueness of social media data. Thus, this paper serves as a tutorial for a simple method of extracting social media data that is accessible to novice health care researchers and public health professionals who are interested in pursuing social media research. The discussed methods were used to extract data from Facebook for a study of maternal perspectives on sudden unexpected infant death.

Indexed as

analysisdata extractionextraction tutorialFacebookFacebook analysisFacebook extractionhealth care researchhealth-relatedmaternal perspectivematernal perspectivesmothermotherspostpostsqualitative datasafe sleepSIDSsocial mediasocial media analysissudden infant death syndromesudden unexpected infant deathSUIDsystematic approachUnited Stateswomen

Identifiers

PMID38980712
PMCPMC11267115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.