Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38980690›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2024

Who is seeking information about traumatic brain injury? Characterizing online course participants.

Hannah Fair, Yasmine V Doust, Nicole Bye, James C Vickers, Christine Padgett, Jenna M Ziebell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah FairWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4409-9132
Yasmine V DoustWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2990-7509
Nicole ByeSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Churchill Avenue, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0976-5870
James C VickersWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5671-4879
Christine PadgettSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Churchill Avenue, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4398-4268
Jenna M ZiebellWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2497-4347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accessible, up-to-date information on traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be challenging to find and is needed to address TBI knowledge gaps and improve outcomes for people who experience a TBI. The Understanding TBI Massive Open Online Course (TBI MOOC) was developed to increase TBI knowledge across a diverse global audience. We sought to characterize the TBI MOOC participant cohort, to understand the reach of the course among this target audience. Examining the characteristics of TBI MOOC enrollees showed that participants came from a wide range of demographic backgrounds, had a variety of TBI experiences and had multiple reasons for enrolling in the MOOC. The majority of course participants shared some characteristics with other groups of health information seekers. Four distinct demographic profiles were identified among TBI MOOC participants (education seekers, TBI-aware participants, TBI care providers and retirees) using a novel approach combining chi-squared tests and network modularity. Participants assigned to the TBI-aware and retiree profiles were most likely to complete all modules of the MOOC, and the TBI-aware profile was more highly represented in more recent iterations of the MOOC. Together, these data indicate that the TBI MOOC provided information to a wide range of people, and particularly engaged participants with personal or family experience of TBI. However, engagement with this course was minimal among some hard-to-reach populations, including men and people with low levels of education, indicating that additional strategies are needed to ensure equity in health promotion.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticAdultAgedFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetMaleMiddle Agedhealth educationhealth promotioninformation seekersMassive Open Online Course (MOOC)traumatic brain injury (TBI)

Identifiers

PMID38980690
PMCPMC11232464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.