Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38980596›Full record

SynthesisUpdates in surgery2024

Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature.

Orlin Belyaev, Tim Fahlbusch, Illya Slobodkin, Wademar Uhl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06512480 (Implementation in Colorectal Surgery of a New Modular and Open Robotic Platform.Pilot Project.), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06512480 recruitingnot on this map

Implementation in Colorectal Surgery of a New Modular and Open Robotic Platform.Pilot Project.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat ValencianaRan2024 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsColorectal SurgeryArmscolonic resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Splenic flexure resection with Hugo™ RAS: Trocar placement, docking settings, and surgical strategy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Orlin Belyaev *Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany. orlin.belyaev@kklbo.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-2292
Tim Fahlbusch *Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2178-6685
Illya SlobodkinDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Wademar UhlDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-3192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann's reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was < 100 ml, and median stay was 8 days. The literature review identified five case series with a total of 23 colorectal procedures: 9 right and 1 left hemicolectomies, 5 ileocaecal, and 4 rectal and 4 sigmoid resections. Results corresponded to ours despite variations in setup used by different authors. A wide spectrum of major colorectal surgery can be safely and effectively performed with the Hugo RAS, even in a cohort of non-selected patients. Ongoing software and hardware upgrade, introduction of robotic energy devices and increasing surgical experience are expected to facilitate procedures and reduce duration of surgery.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresAgedColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleOperative TimeRectumRetrospective StudiesColorectal surgeryHugoRobotic assistedSetupTotal mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID38980596
PMCPMC11455732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.