ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Thymoma resection and myasthenia gravis: what is the neurological outcome in patients older than 65 years?
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic Extended Thymectomy in Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis: A 21-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 172 Patients.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Assessment of functioning using the WHODAS 2.0 among people with myasthenia gravis-associated disability: a nationwide follow-up study.BMC public health · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To increase the neurological results in patients older than 65 years with myasthenia gravis after thymectomy, we retrospectively analysed this outcome in a large bicentric cohort of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG)years, for which surgery was indicated for a concurrent thymoma. From 1/2000 to 2/2022, 502 patients underwent thymectomy for thymic epithelial tumours (TETs) in two high-volume Institutions (167aged more than 65 years). Among them, 66 patients were affected by TET and MG, representing our final study group. The mean age for MG onset was 68.3 ± 6 years.At surgery, the Osserman score 2 was the most diffuse in our cohort (43, 65.1%), followed by 1 (20, 30.3%). In 11 cases, the MG diagnosis coincided with thymoma diagnosis. In the other cases, the interval between MG diagnosis and surgery was 1.7 years ± 1.9. The most common surgical approach was sternotomy (41,62.1%), followed by RATS (14,21.2%). The most frequent TNM stage was T1N0 (75.7%) and most patients had WHO type-B tumour. After radical thymectomy, 58 patients (88%) reported a significant neurological improvement. According to MGFA-PIS, after surgery we had 4 (6%) complete stable remission, 11 (16.7%) pharmacological remission, 43 (65.2%) minimal manifestation, 2 (3%) worsening/death for MG, and 5 (7.6%) unchanged. No association was found between neurological outcome and age of MG onset, kind of pharmacological therapy before surgery, surgical approach (sternotomy vs others), tumour dimension, the ITMIG stage and the preoperative Osserman score. For MG and thymoma-afftected patients over 65 years, thymectomy seems to be an effective treatment to improve neurological symptoms. We suggest to set up clinical trials to explore the neurological efficacy of mini-invasive thymectomy in clinically selected MG patients aged over 65 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.