Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38980590›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2024

A model for identifying potentially inappropriate medication used in older people with dementia: a machine learning study.

Qiaozhi Hu, Mengnan Zhao, Fei Teng, Gongchao Lin, Zhaohui Jin, Ting Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiaozhi Hu *Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-1089
Mengnan Zhao *West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Fei TengSchool of Information Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Gongchao LinSchool of Information Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Zhaohui JinDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. jzh-pharmacy@scu.edu.cn.
Ting XuDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-9259

Funding

Science and technology project of Chengdu Health Commission 2022020Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2021YFG0136Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2023NSFSC1696West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYJC18028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults with dementia often face the risk of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use. The quality of PIM evaluation is hindered by researchers' unfamiliarity with evaluation criteria for inappropriate drug use. While traditional machine learning algorithms can enhance evaluation quality, they struggle with the multilabel nature of prescription data.

aimThis study aimed to combine six machine learning algorithms and three multilabel classification models to identify correlations in prescription information and develop an optimal model to identify PIMs in older adults with dementia.

methodThis study was conducted from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. We used cluster sampling to obtain prescription data from patients 65 years and older with dementia. We assessed PIMs using the 2019 Beers criteria, the most authoritative and widely recognized standard for PIM detection. Our modeling process used three problem transformation methods (binary relevance, label powerset, and classifier chain) and six classification algorithms.

resultsWe identified 18,338 older dementia patients and 36 PIMs types. The classifier chain + categorical boosting (CatBoost) model demonstrated superior performance, with the highest accuracy (97.93%), precision (95.39%), recall (94.07%), F1 score (95.69%), and subset accuracy values (97.41%), along with the lowest Hamming loss value (0.0011) and an acceptable duration of the operation (371s).

conclusionThis research introduces a pioneering CC + CatBoost warning model for PIMs in older dementia patients, utilizing machine-learning techniques. This model enables a quick and precise identification of PIMs, simplifying the manual evaluation process.

Indexed as

DementiaMachine LearningPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMachine learningOlder dementia patientsPotentially inappropriate medicationsPrescription

Identifiers

PMID38980590
PMCPMC11286713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.