ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
3D-Bioprinted Skin Tissues for Improving Wound Healing: Current Status and Perspective.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant-Mediated Silver Nanoparticle Formulations for Wound Healing: A Process-Property-Performance Perspective.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Engineering in vitro models to replicate the complexity of chronic wounds.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Engineering the Healing Process: Advanced In Vitro Wound Models and Technologies.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in tissue engineering enable the fabrication of complex and functional tissues or organs. In particular, bioprinting enables controlled and accurate deposition of cells, biomaterials, and growth factors to create complex 3D skin constructs specific to a particular individual. Despite these advancements, challenges such as vascularization, long-term stability, and regulatory considerations hinder the clinical translation of bioprinted skin constructs. This chapter focuses on such approaches using advanced biomaterials and bioprinting techniques to overcome the current barriers in wound-healing studies. Moreover, it addresses current obstacles in wound-healing studies, highlighting the need for continued research and innovation to overcome these barriers and facilitate the practical utilization of bioprinted skin constructs in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.