Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38980431›Full record

SynthesisPediatric surgery international2024

Comprehensive meta-analysis of surgical procedure for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: thoracoscopic versus open repair.

Soichi Shibuya, Irene Paraboschi, Stefano Giuliani, Takafumi Tsukui, Andreea Matei, Maricarmen Olivos, Mikihiro Inoue, Simon A Clarke, Atsuyuki Yamataka, Augusto Zani and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Soichi ShibuyaStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, Developmental Biology and Cancer Research & Teaching Department, Zayed Centre for Research Into Rare Disease in Children, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1E, UK. soshibu@juntendo.ac.jp.
Irene ParaboschiDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
Stefano GiulianiDepartment of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Takafumi TsukuiDepartment of Pediatric General and Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan.
Andreea MateiDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maricarmen OlivosChelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mikihiro InoueDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan.
Simon A ClarkeChelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Atsuyuki YamatakaDepartment of Pediatric General and Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan.
Augusto ZaniDepartment of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Simon EatonStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, Developmental Biology and Cancer Research & Teaching Department, Zayed Centre for Research Into Rare Disease in Children, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1E, UK.
Paolo De CoppiStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, Developmental Biology and Cancer Research & Teaching Department, Zayed Centre for Research Into Rare Disease in Children, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1E, UK. p.decoppi@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

CDH UK/Sparks/Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity Project Grant 16ICH03Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Overseas Research Fellowships 310072National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR-RP-2014-04-046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies have shown a higher recurrence rate and longer operative times for thoracoscopic repair (TR) of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) compared to open repair (OR). An updated meta-analysis was conducted to re-evaluate the surgical outcomes of TR.

methodsA comprehensive literature search comparing TR and OR in neonates was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement (PROSPERO: CRD42020166588).

resultsFourteen studies were selected for quantitative analysis, including a total of 709 patients (TR: 308 cases, OR: 401 cases). The recurrence rate was higher [Odds ratio: 4.03, 95% CI (2.21, 7.36), p < 0.001] and operative times (minutes) were longer [Mean Difference (MD): 43.96, 95% CI (24.70, 63.22), p < 0.001] for TR compared to OR. A significant reduction in the occurrence of postoperative bowel obstruction was observed in TR (5.0%) compared to OR (14.8%) [Odds ratio: 0.42, 95% CI (0.20, 0.89), p = 0.02].

conclusionsTR remains associated with higher recurrence rates and longer operative times. However, the reduced risk of postoperative bowel obstruction suggests potential long-term benefits. This study emphasizes the importance of meticulous patient selection for TR to mitigate detrimental effects on patients with severe disease.

Indexed as

Hernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalHerniorrhaphyThoracoscopyHumansInfant, NewbornOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeBowel obstructionCongenital diaphragmatic herniaMeta-analysisMinimally invasive surgeryNeonatal surgeryThoracoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38980431
PMCPMC11233350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.