ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
To scan or not to scan? A retrospective cohort study analysing the efficacy of routine post-operative CT after brain biopsy.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostoperative management following elective cranial surgery, particularly after biopsy procedures, varies significantly across neurosurgical centres. Routine postoperative head CT scans, traditionally performed to detect complications such as intracranial bleeding or cerebral oedema, lack substantial evidence supporting their necessity.
methodsThis study is a retrospective cohort analysis conducted at a regional neurosurgical department of 236 patients who underwent brain biopsies between 2018 and 2022. Patient data, including demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes, were collected and analysed. The outcomes investigated were the incidence and impact of postoperative CT scans on time to discharge, management changes, and the influence of preoperative anticoagulation.
resultsOut of 236 patients, 205 (86.86%) underwent postoperative CT scans. There was no significant relationship between postoperative hematoma, as detected on a CT scan, and neurological deficit (p = 0.443), or between preoperative anticoagulation and postoperative bleeding on CT scans (p = 0.464). Patients who had postoperative CT scans had a significantly longer length of stay (LOS) compared to those who did not (p < 0.001). Intraoperative bleeding was a predictor of hematoma on postoperative CT (p = 0.017) but not of postoperative neurological deficit. The routine postoperative CT scan showed limited predictive value for symptomatic deficits, with a positive predictive value of 6.67% and a negative predictive value of 96.88%.
conclusionsRoutine postoperative CT scans after brain biopsies do not significantly impact management or improve patient outcomes but are associated with longer hospital stays. CT scans should be reserved for patients showing clinical signs of complications rather than used as a routine procedure after a brain biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38980421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.