Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38980399›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2024

Radial artery catheterization using a novel T-type ultrasound probe: a single-center randomized study.

Mitsutaka Edanaga, Tomohiro Chaki, Michiko Osuda, Michiaki Yamakage

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mitsutaka EdanagaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S1, W16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan. naga16taka@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-2615
Tomohiro ChakiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S1, W16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan.
Michiko OsudaDepartment of Anesthesiology, NTT Medical Center Sapporo, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Michiaki YamakageDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S1, W16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound guidance has been reported to facilitate radial artery catheterization compared with the palpation method. However, a recent meta-analysis showed that there was not significant differences in the first attempt success rate between the long-axis in-plane (LA-IP) method and the short-axis out-of-plane method. In 2023, we started using a novel T-type probe. We can recognize the needle first during the radial artery access with the short-axis view and then dose it with the long-axis view using the T-type probe. Therefore, we hypothesized that the T-type probe-guided method might heighten the first attempt success rate in radial artery catheterization, even for non-expert practitioners, compared with the LA-IP technique. One hundred and fifty adult patients, older than 20 years, ASA I to III, were randomly assigned to the T-type probe-guided group (Group T: n = 75) or the LA-IP group (Group L: n = 75). The primary outcome was the first attempt success rate. The first attempt success rate in Group T (49/71, 69%) was significantly higher than that in Group L (31/68, 46%) (p = 0.0062). The present study showed that the T-type probe might facilitate the radial artery catheterization rather than the LA-IP method.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralRadial ArteryUltrasonography, InterventionalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadial artery catheterizationT-type probeUltrasound-guided

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.