ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2024
[Overview of intraocular lenses with optics for correcting presbyopia].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Performance After Implantation of a New Purely Refractive Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens in Cataract Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Trial
- [Patient selection for unilateral cataract : Case report on a dysphotopsia-optimized, nondiffractive, presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Monofocal intraocular lens based on the Bessel principle for improved intermediate vision: a comparative assessment.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- An Update on Intraocular Lens Technology for Presbyopia Correction and Visual Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Objective assessment of accommodation with an accommodative intraocular lens: Development of methodology and case report.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
- Presbyopia: Current Perspectives and Prospects for Patients.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- The Effect of the Capsular Bag on the Optical Performance of an IOL Measured in an Ex Vivo Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Simulated ocular biometry effects on add-power demand in multifocal intraocular lenses.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Article
- Maximizing extend visual outcomes with extend focus intraocular lens in eyes with axial length shorter than 24 mm.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years intraocular lenses (IOLs) for correcting presbyopia have been significantly improved and diversified. There are currently many different IOL models based on a wide variety of optical designs.
objectiveThe wide variety of available IOL solutions to correct presbyopia can be challenging for surgeons and patients. In everyday practice, the question is which IOL is best for which patient. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis overview describes and categorizes the currently available implants. The respective optical properties are analyzed and clinical study results are discussed, in particular those evaluating visual performance and the occurrence of photic phenomena.
resultsMonofocal-plus IOLs provide improved intermediate visual acuity with optimal distant visual acuity and minimal photic phenomena. Extended depth of field (EDoF) IOLs extend the depth of field through different optical principles and provide good distant and intermediate visual acuity. Trifocal lenses enable the greatest independence from spectacles at the price of a higher probability of dysphotopsia.
conclusionThe selection of the most suitable IOL for correction of presbyopia requires a balance between the patient's visual needs and possible side effects. An adequate knowledge of the currently available implants allows a patient-oriented selection of IOLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38980387What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.