Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38980338›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025

Fluorescence confocal microscopy for evaluation of fresh surgical specimens and consecutive tumor cell isolation in rare pediatric tumors.

S Gretser, M N Kinzler, T M Theilen, P J Wild, M Vogler, E Gradhand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S GretserGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 6, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany. gretser@googlemail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4875-3808
M N KinzlerGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
T M TheilenGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
P J WildGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 6, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
M VoglerGoethe University Frankfurt, Institute for Experimental Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
E GradhandGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 6, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung A2023-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is an optical technique that uses laser light sources of different wavelengths to generate real-time images of fresh, unfixed tissue specimens. FCM allows histological evaluation of fresh tissue samples without the associated cryo artifacts after frozen sectioning. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate pediatric tumor specimens and assess their suitability for fresh tumor sampling. In addition, we aimed to determine whether tumor cell isolation for stable cell culture is still feasible after FCM imaging. Pediatric tumor specimens were imaged using FCM. Tumor viability and suitability for tissue sampling were evaluated and compared with H&E staining after paraffin embedding. In addition, FCM-processed and non-FCM-processed tissue samples were sent for tumor cell isolation to evaluate possible effects after FCM processing. When comparing estimated tumor cell viability using FCM and H&E, we found good to excellent correlating estimates (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.891, p < 0.001), as well as substantial agreement in whether the tissue appeared adequate for fresh tissue collection (κ = 0.762, p < 0.001). After FCM, seven out of eight samples yielded passable cell cultures, compared to eight out of eight for non-FCM processed samples. Our study suggests that the use of FCM in tumor sampling can increase the yield of suitable fresh tumor samples by identifying viable tumor areas and ensuring that sufficient tissue remains for diagnosis. Our study also provides first evidence that the isolation and growth of tumor cells in culture are not compromised by the FCM technique.

Indexed as

Cell SeparationNeoplasmsCell SurvivalChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceProspective StudiesSpecimen HandlingDigital pathologyFluorescence confocal microscopyPediatric pathologyPediatric surgery

Identifiers

PMID38980338
PMCPMC11950019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.