Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38979857›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2024

Translational Aspects of 3D and 4D Printing and Bioprinting.

Scott Taylor, Eva Mueller, Lamont R Jones, Ashley V Makela, Nureddin Ashammakhi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Innovate to heal: 3D bioprinting tackles epidermolysis bullosa.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott TaylorPoly-Med, Inc., Anderson, SC 29625, USA.
Eva MuellerRicoh 3D for Healthcare, Ricoh USA, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA.
Lamont R JonesDepartment of Otolaryngology, Henry Ford Heath, Detroit, MI 48322, USA.
Ashley V MakelaInstitute for Quantitative Health Science & Engineering and Department of Engineering, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2048-6832
Nureddin AshammakhiInstitute for Quantitative Health Science & Engineering and Department of Engineering, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0181-6055

Funding

Multi-organ-on-chip device for modeling opioid reinforcement and withdrawal, and the negative affective component of pain: a therapeutic screening tool.UH3TR003148 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ASHAMMAKHI, NUREDDIN, MAIDMENT, NIGEL T · 2022 to 2024
$2.4M
American Heart Association 23IPA1053441Department of Surgery 00679169Estonian Research Council PRG1903Henry Ford HealthMichigan Translational Research and Commercialization Innovation Hub for AgBio MTRAC AgBioNCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR003148NIH HHS UH3TR003148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printed medical devices include orthopedic and craniofacial implants, surgical tools, and external prosthetics that have been directly used in patients. While the advances of additive manufacturing techniques in the production of medical devices have been on the rise, clinical translation of living cellular constructs face significant limitations in terms of regulatory affairs, process technology, and materials development. In this perspective, the current status-quo of 3D and four-dimensional (4D) (bio)printing is summarized, current advancements are discussed and the challenges that need to be addressed for improved industrial translation and clinical applications of bioprinting are highlighted. It is focused on a multidisciplinary approach in discussing the key translational considerations, from the perspective of industry, regulatory bodies, funding strategies, and future directions.

Indexed as

BioprintingPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringAnimalsHumansTissue ScaffoldsTranslational Research, Biomedical3D printing4D printingregulatory approvalscale‐uptranslational research

Identifiers

PMID38979857
PMCPMC12344630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.